There is a version of every product that never sees the light of day. It lives in a file, preserved in a meeting room, or on a whiteboard that was erased long ago. It is not a failed design. It is a design that was almost perfect. It solved the problem elegantly. It met every requirement. It had no obvious flaws. And yet, it never shipped.

I was part of a team that designed such a product. It was a kitchen appliance, a small countertop device that would have changed how people approached a common task. The design was elegant, the engineering was sound, and the user research was overwhelmingly positive. We were confident. We were proud. We were wrong.

The Almost Perfect Trap

The design was almost perfect on paper. It was simple, intuitive, and beautiful. The interface was clean, the interactions were smooth, and the feedback was clear. The user testing was flawless. Participants praised the design and asked when they could buy it. We had checked every box.

But the design had a hidden flaw. It was so perfect that it left no room for the user to make it their own. It was so simple that it eliminated any sense of discovery or mastery. It was so intuitive that it made the user feel like a passive passenger rather than an active participant. The design was flawless, but it was also sterile.

The problem was not what the design did. It was what the design did not do. It did not engage the user. It did not invite exploration. It did not reward learning. It was a tool, but it had no soul. The user could use it perfectly, but they would never love it.

The Feedback That Changed Everything

The feedback that stopped the project came from a single user. She used the product perfectly. She followed every instruction, completed every task, and expressed nothing but satisfaction. When asked what she thought, she said: “It works well, but I don’t feel like I’m using it.”

She could not articulate the problem. She knew it worked, but she did not feel connected to it. The design was a success in every measurable way, but it failed in a way that could not be measured. It was a tool, but it was not a companion.

The Lesson

The design that was almost perfect taught me that perfection is not the goal. The goal is meaning. A design that is flawless but soulless will be abandoned. A design that is imperfect but meaningful will be embraced.

The user does not want a tool that is invisible. They want a tool that is rewarding. They want to discover, to learn, to master. They want a relationship with the product, not just a transaction. A design that is almost perfect is a design that has forgotten this.

The Bottom Line

The design that was almost perfect never shipped. It sits in a folder, a reminder of what might have been. But it also serves as a lesson. Perfection is not the goal. Connection is. The design that is almost perfect is the design that has forgotten the user. The design that is imperfect but meaningful is the design that will be remembered.

The next time you design something, do not aim for perfection. Aim for meaning. The user will not remember the flawless execution. They will remember the connection. They will remember how it made them feel. That is the design that ships. That is the design that lasts.

About the Author

author photo

Peter Makeshoff

Peter Makeshoff is the founder and main author of Designer Daily.